#090: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (TOS movie novelization)

This week, peace sells, but who’s buying? The Klingons, that’s who. Perpetual war, it turns out, is not economically sustainable, and they’re on the prowl for a better business model. But players on all sides have a vested interested in keeping things the way they are, and a road that was as smooth as CGI Klingon blood suddenly becomes very bumpy. If Kirk wants to make a history omelet, he’ll have to break a few prejudice eggs—but starting a fire in his new digs might be kind of difficult. Where did the Organians skip off to? Why is Valeris so emotional for a Vulcan? And to what extent can a novelization critique the movie it’s about? All this and more in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, the book that actually cares about things that happened in Star Trek V!

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Author: J.M. Dillard
Pages: 301
Published: January 1992
Timeline: Six years after The Final Frontier
Prerequisites: Events of Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, and “Errand of Mercy” (TOS S1E26)

After three straight weeks of TNG shenanigans, we’re finally back to TOS, only to immediately get movie sign. But hey, it’s one of the even-numbered ones! Specifically, it’s the one where the Klingons decide to give peace a whirl since constant war is bankrupting them. Starfleet has tapped the Enterprise to host the peace delegation led by Chancellor Gorkon, and while Kirk has aired some shockingly ugly feelings about Klingons stemming from their killing of his son David Marcus, he’s willing to be professional and play his part. A nerve-wracking dinner fills the air with enough tension to be cut with a bat’leth, but at least nobody’s killed anyone yet.

Even that absurdly low bar proves insurmountable when the Enterprise appears to fire torpedoes at the defenseless Klingon ship. Kirk and McCoy beam over to make sure nobody is hurt and are summarily framed and charged with Gorkon’s death in a kangaroo court and sentenced to the mines at Rura Penthe, deep in the heart of Klingon territory. They’ll need the help of David Bowie’s wife if they want to get to Khitomer and crash the peace conference before the saboteurs who manipulated them into the gulag get their way.

As always, what I’m most concerned with when it comes to movie and TV novelizations is the extra material. Sure enough, The Undiscovered Country delivers, albeit in ways I wasn’t expecting. It begins with a prologue in which Kirk pays a visit to a comatose Carol Marcus, who’s in the hospital after a Klingon attack on her latest research site. Flashbacks reveal Carol to be as full of hate for Klingons as Jim, for the same reason (their role in David’s death) and some others, which has the effect of softening Kirk’s extremism by making it appear as though he’s angry on the behalf of someone other than himself. Naturally, as the main character, Kirk enjoys the privilege of rationalizing his racism and riding a tidy redemption arc away from it. Other characters don’t get off the hook so easily.

Unlike other movie tie-ins, Dillard often uses the space here to hold the film’s and characters’ feet to the fire. Lines that pass without comment in the movie are nailed to the wall here—often by Uhura, whose vocal shock and lack of hesitation to call out her peers are the only truly proper reactions to such free-flying bigotry. She cites Scotty drinking with Korrd in The Final Frontier as a “how soon we forget” admonishment and gives Chekov the business for his cheeky “Guess who’s coming to dinner?” remark, as well she should.1 The movie exposes these true feelings but often doesn’t hold the characters accountable for them, a mistake this book does its best to rectify.

Dillard also repeatedly addresses the absence of the Organians, which is a great question, not to mention an odd omission in light of how that other Nicholas Meyer-penned Treksterpiece, The Wrath of Khan, relied on “Space Seed” to inform its premise (though even there, continuity occasionally took a back seat to style). Valeris also receives a boatload of supplemental backstory; among other things, her distinctly unVulcan name, lack of emotional control, and motivation for her actions are all sufficiently explored. Previous movie novelizations have brought a lot to the table, and it’s no surprise that this one carries that torch.

The Carol Marcus thread is the main running non-canon concern, but it eventually peters out. And when it runs out of gas, it runs out hard. At first, I thought this was the inevitable consequence of the canon asserting itself (as it must), but when you get down to it, it’s more that it simply doesn’t matter all that much. Whether the thread’s dying off is a simple oversight in narrative detail or an implicit admission of its ultimate lack of use to the story, I can’t say I wasn’t fine with it essentially shrinking to nothing.

As for the conventional wisdom of the even-numbered installments being the so-called “good ones”: having at last seen all the TOS movies, I will say that I can see where that assessment comes from, although I find it unacceptably reductive. The gap in quality between II/IV/VI and I/III/V is tangible, but I’m not prepared to declare all the movies on the wrong side of that gap bad. Each one has at least a few qualities to recommend it, and I”d gladly rewatch any of them. If I laid down a best-to-least-best order right now, it would be: 2, 4, 6, 1, 5, 3.2 And with that authoritative declaration, we bid a fond LLAP to the Original Series films. It’s been a joy to finally understand what the hype was all about.

MVP & LVP

  • The MVP this week, for reasons already discussed, is Uhura. Is she going to stand silently by while her friends casually sling racist jabs about Klingons on the eve of potential galactic peace? Will she take for granted as an immutable fact of the universe that Klingons are bloodthirsty, murderous savages? No, she absolutely will not. Uhura is the purest soul on the bridge, and with the possible exception of Spock, it isn’t an especially close race.
  • My vote for LVP goes to Carol Marcus. I admit I run a bit cold on the character in general. Outside of Wrath of Khan and its attendant book, I’ve never found her very compelling, and as a “one that got away” for Kirk, I tend to prefer Lori Ciana. So forgive me if I’m not terribly entertained by her spending most of the present in a coma and having her usual strained back-and-forth with Kirk otherwise.

Nuggets & Other Stray Bits

  • Many characters that are officially unnamed in the credits of the film receive full identities here, but there are three major standouts: 1) the Federation President played by Kurtwood Smith, here identified not just by name (Ra-ghoratrei) but by species as well (Deltan),3 2) Grace Lee Whitney’s “Excelsior Communications Officer”, respectfully and properly referred to as Janice Rand, 3) the Klingon defense attorney played by Michael Dorn, named … Colonel Worf. Yeah. This may just be a simple trick to help the reader mentally picture Dorn in the role while reading, but it feels ultra-lazy.
  • p. 57: “‘History is filled with turning points,” Spock said, unruffled by [Valeris’s] intensity. At her puzzled reaction, he added, ‘You must have faith.’ / ‘Faith…?'” — Yes, Valeris. Faith.
  • p. 64: “The Klingons had been portrayed as villains in the media to the extent that political cartoons portrayed them with horns sprouting from their ridged foreheads.” — It’s depressing to imagine that even in the good Star Trek future, we haven’t gotten rid of our Ben Garrisons.
  • p. 263: After 30 years of on-and-off long-distance correspondence and hopes of rekindling their romance during his impending retirement, Chekov gets turned down by Irina Galliulin, who’s decided to see someone else. Talk about a bad beat.
  • p. 267: Pardek gets a blink-and-you-miss-it name-check.

Final Verdict

I give Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country 3.5 out of 5 cloaked Birds of Prey. This marks the first time we’ve ever seen an author so openly grapple with the less savory aspects of a script, and frankly, it’s a bracing change of pace. Dillard’s nuanced take sheds much-needed light on nasty and confusing elements of the story that deserve more rigorous examination. It’s a unique approach that makes the book a vital supplement to any viewing of the movie, and I’m interested to see how Dillard applies it to her treatments of the TNG films.

NEXT TIME: We are Spartacus

Previous

#089: Perchance to Dream (TNG #19)

Next

#091: Spartacus (TNG #20)

5 Comments

  1. Might do your readers a service and mention WHY Nicoles rejected the line so strenuously.

  2. Matthew N

    Don’t forget, “Colonel Worf” was referred to by name in the film too! He’s Worf’s grandfather.

  3. Adam Goss

    I’m surprised! I’ve never known anyone to rate Star Trek V over Star Trek III! I mean, granted, Search for Spock has got a bit of a plot hole in it that would have taken some extra dialogue and maybe an extra scene or two, and some re-arrangement of existing scenes, to correct, but worse than Final Frontier? What’s your reasoning? I’m very curious, and I did not sense any dislike for the film in your review of III’s novelization.

  4. Adam Goss

    Erf, feel free to delete that comment. I got my memory mixed up, though I’d read your review of III.

  5. Adam Goss

    It still bothers me that Carol Marcus wasn’t the love interest Kirk was dealing with when Picard finds him in the Nexus in the following movie. I really gotta wonder who’s idea “Antonia” was for the script.

Leave a Reply to Matthew N Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén