#001: Star Trek: The Motion Picture (TOS #1)

The Pocket Books universe begins with the novelization of Star Trek: The Motion Picture, written by none other than the Great Bird of the Galaxy himself, Gene Roddenberry. Lest you think this is something worth getting excited about, I would advise you to temper your expectations.

 

 

Star Trek: The Motion Picture
Author: Gene Roddenberry
Pages: 252
Published: December 1979
Timeline: After TOS
Prerequisites: None*

* When I say “none”, I implicitly mean “aside from general familiarity with the series”.

Star Trek: The Motion Picture represented the series’s maiden voyage to the silver screen. Originally, it was going to be the pilot for a new TV show called Star Trek: Phase II, which was to be the flagship series of a new TV network by Paramount, but then Paramount backed out on that idea, and the pilot for Phase II was reworked into the script for The Motion Picture.

The Motion Picture also marked the series’s big return to the limelight, having at that time been absent from the collective pop culture consciousness for a full decade (or just six years if you want to count the Animated Series). That ten-year hiatus is important to keep in mind, because the context packed in it helps ease the annoyance of some things people hate about this movie, most of them having to do with why this story moves slower than a tortoise with a hernia.

If you’ve never seen Star Trek: The Motion Picture, it’s a hair over two hours long but feels like six. The first 45 minutes consist of Kirk all but blackmailing his way back into the captain’s chair after getting bored of his promotion to Admiral (which effectively turned him from a hotshot captain on the bleeding edge of frontier exploration into a desk jockey) and seizing on the giant cloud approaching Earth as an opportunity to relive his salad days, along with some lavish, indulgent shots of the Enterprise in spacedock that are like the opening shot in Spaceballs that spans the entire length of Spaceball One, except these are longer. The rest of the runtime plays out more or less like a regular episode of the TV show (a specific one, actually: season 2’s “The Changeling”), but with more rainbows, interminable shots of the Enterprise moving deeper into the cloud, and characters people don’t really care about.

There are actually perfectly reasonable explanations for most of this movie’s shenanigans. For example, Decker and Ilia were prominent characters in the Phase II pilot, and were played both there and here by Stephen Collins and Persis Khambatta, respectively. When the series fell through, their roles transferred to the movie more or less unscathed as kind of a consolation prize, which explains why two people no one had ever seen or heard of got more lines and screen time than fan favorites Scotty, Sulu, Uhura, and Chekov combined.

And yes, the movie spends an ungodly amount of time just staring at the Enterprise from every possible angle. But think about the fans who went to see the movie in 1979, who hadn’t seen the show in ten years, and were finally getting to see the Enterprise, a ship they’d previously only seen on their tiny fuzzy television sets, in stunning detail on the big screen for the first time. They were probably really revved up to see their favorite ship and all their favorite characters back in action, even if they were wearing dorky uniforms (which everyone hated, and still mostly does, rightfully so, though you could argue the look was actually vindicated by the rise of the 21st-century Apple aesthetic). These sorts of things might be difficult to sit through and put up with when viewing the film in the present day, and I’m not saying they’re good or totally defensible decisions, but all things considered, it’s hard to say the victory lap wasn’t earned.

Still, it’s little wonder the movie got stuck with the derisive nickname “The Slow Motion Picture”. And that glacial pace translates to the book as well: it takes ten chapters—nearly 100 pages—just to get into space, and after that, it just sort of gallops along, and there are entire chapters where not a whole lot happens and nothing moves forward significantly. The first time I read this book, it took me almost three weeks to get through it. I really had to make myself press on to finish it.

The pacing isn’t the only problem. I’m hardly a prude, but Roddenberry’s yen for the female form quite clearly intrudes upon and suffocates his writing. Over and over, he lingers on prurient observations. Just looking at a hologram of his colleague and one-time lover Admiral Lori Ciana, Kirk “could feel the slight pressure of his genitals responding to those memories” (p. 32). I’m aware of Kirk as a man who has lots of sex, but I don’t want to be in his brain while he reminisces about it. When Spock goes to meditate in the ship’s recreational alcoves, he overhears humans having sex. And when the probe assumes Ilia’s form, you might reasonably believe that John Updike somehow turned in a cameo for one page (178) as Roddenberry describes her as “almost unbearably lovely in her nudity” and flaps his pervy gums about her “impossibly lovely, hard-tipped breasts”, and how Kirk can’t help but keep “bringing his attention back to her naked body”. And he still manages to come back to it sporadically in the pages ahead! None of this comes across in the film, so it’s extra weird for it to be in the book.

And then there’s the italics. MY GOD, THE ITALICS. You can’t swing a dead sehlat without running into entire paragraphs of italicized text. There are so many italics, it would send Jerry Holkins into a diabetic coma. Most italicized passages are written in the third person, and though you can also tell that they’re supposed to be reflecting the thoughts going through the characters’ heads at that moment (as italics normally do), it’s all incredibly clumsy and sends the text spiraling into histrionics, and in general casts a really amateurish pall over the writing.

One thing you would want the novelization of a movie to do is fill in any gaps in your understanding of certain elements of the film, and this is one area where The Motion Picture: The Novel actually performs admirably. Pretty much anything in the movie that you can imagine as a plot hole or a non sequitur is explained to satisfaction in the book. Roddenberry clears up the mystery of those goofy belt buckles (they’re scanners that constantly upload updated vital signs to sickbay), adequately covers that weird line out of left field from Ilia about her oath of celibacy being on record with descriptions of Deltan pheromones and what they do to humans (again, leaning a little too hard on the sexual aspect in the explaining), and generally acquits himself rather well in the process. It’s not enough to save an overall bush-league effort, but it’s something.

Nuggets and Other Stray Bits

  • As you can see from the picture above, my copy has a barcode sticker over Spock’s eyes that I ended up not taking off because it adhered too much to the cover and peeling it off would have damaged it more than I would be willing to accept. However, when life hands me lemons, I make Saurian brandy, and thus I have chosen to think of it more as a “Spock wearing Geordi’s VISOR” limited collector’s edition variant cover, of which I own the only copy in existence.
  • The book starts with two prefaces, one “written by” Admiral Kirk, the other by Roddenberry. Kirk’s preface explores why people of average intelligence make better space explorers than very intelligent people while modestly downplaying his own heroics and achievements. Roddenberry explains why Kirk “trusted him” to write the book, and also talks about what attracts him to Star Trek and keeps bringing him back to its ideas. Both are pretty cute, though Roddenberry’s drops the facade a little too hard midway through.
  • During Kolinahr, Spock allows himself to think of Kirk one last time before purging all emotions and connections to humans, specifically using the Vulcan word t’hy’la, which is explained in a footnote as meaning “friend” but also possibly “brother” or “lover”. One can only imagine this was Roddenberry’s clumsy attempt to combat the then-nascent slash fic trend, which originated in Star Trek fan fiction. Unfortunately, the footnote is a bit of a headscratcher, and kind of ends up leaving things more open-ended than perhaps Roddenberry intended. As you were, slash fic writers!
  • On his way in to Starfleet Command, Kirk passes Alcatraz Children’s Park. Talk about nerfed!
  • The transporter malfunction scene where Vulcan science officer Sonak dies is much more gruesome in the book, detailing “writhing masses of chaotic flesh with skeletal shapes and pumping organs on the outsides of the ‘bodies'” (one of the few really effective pieces of description Roddenberry managed to turn out), and we also learn who the second casualty is: Lori Ciana, a colleague of Kirk’s in the admiralty that he also got cozy with (as is his way), and who is implied to be boarding because she took a rank reduction to fill an unstaffed role on the mission. We’ll get to know her better about a year down the road in the event novel The Lost Years, by J.M. Dillard.
  • On page 35, Kirk says “Shit!” in response to some information about the cloud, which the book makes some mildly amusing kerfuffle about, like it’s some archaic hoary chestnut that only old people bust out in the future. As I write, some folks are flipping out about Star Trek: Discovery dropping the F-bomb, something I can sympathize with both sides of (I do think it was delivered kind of poorly and awkwardly, but it’s also a good point that it was in-character in that it was done in a moment of unrestrained enthusiasm about finding out new stuff about the universe and not just like “Klingon ship destroyed, Captain. We nailed those mother____ers”). I just point it out to note that Star Trek is no stranger to heavier curse words—just that they tend to hide them in their less accessible media.
  • While the name of the probe is rendered as “V’Ger” in most official materials, Roddenberry chooses to stylize it as “Vejur”. I imagine he did this to fend off the possibility of readers spoiling the twist for themselves, as anyone exposed to “V’Ger” enough times would probably eventually connect the dots and figure out, “Oh, duh, V’Ger, Voyager, it’s a space probe, that’s why it came back to Earth,” etc. Personally, I approve of the decision.

Final Verdict

I give Star Trek: The Motion Picture: The Novel: The Squeakquel: The 3-D IMAX Experience 2.5 out of 5 male gazes. It answers some questions the movie raises (but then raises some different ones of its own), and it may have served a solid purpose in its day if you missed the theatrical run and didn’t have HBO at the turn of the 80s, but Roddenberry’s textual telling is hard both to read and to want to read, not to mention lurid and gross. Completionists only need apply.

Roddenberry never wrote another Star Trek novel, and given how messy this one is, it’s not hard to see why. In its own way, the book is as hard to read as the movie is to watch. That does mean, however, that it’s the only Pocket Books novel that counts as canon. From here on out though, it’s all extra-canonical, doesn’t-technically-count adventuring. Even the other movie novelizations.

NEXT TIME: The Entropy Effect

Previous

#000: Welcome

Next

#002: The Entropy Effect (TOS #2)

2 Comments

  1. tigeraid

    It was a long time ago, but I remember this being really boring in book form too, yeah. Never occurred to me that Roddenberry wrote it, which explains a lot. He was not a writer.

    And it’s a Trek novel that mentions genitals!

  2. I honestly thought the most recent Discovery novels were the first ones with ‘heavy’ curse words, it’s been decades since I’ve read this first novel so it completely slipped my mind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén